Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39600013›Full record

ReviewEuropean burn journal2024

Burn Wound Care Strategies for the Battlefield and Austere Settings.

Sarah Shingleton, Jared Folwell, Ian Jones, Michael Gleason, Alicia Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European burn journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah ShingletonUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Jared FolwellUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Ian JonesUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8694-7814
Michael GleasonUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2112-0574
Alicia WilliamsUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are commonly encountered in the battlefield environment; however, the availability of burn expertise and specialized supplies is variable. Initial burn care should remain focused on cooling the burn, preventing hypothermia, basic wound cleansing, and evacuation. Key ongoing burn wound management principles include wound debridement, accurate burn size and depth estimation, wound care, ongoing wound evaluation, and treatment of suspected Gram-negative wound infection. Operative management should be limited to urgent procedures, and definitive burn management should be performed only after evacuation to a higher level of care. Flexibility, creativity, and the ability to adapt care to the tactical environment are key to the successful management of burn injuries in battlefield and austere settings.

Indexed as

austerebattlefieldburnsburn wound carecombatprolonged field care

Identifiers

PMID39600013
PMCPMC11571820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.