Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599946›Full record

ArticleEuropean burn journal2024

Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors' Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects.

Raaba S M Thambithurai, Lotte van Dammen, Margriet E van Baar, Hendriët Wanders, Angelique E A M Weel-Koenders, Tsjitske M Haanstra, Carine M H van Schie, Paul P M van Zuijlen, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Eelke Bosma and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European burn journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Raaba S M ThambithuraiErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lotte van DammenBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-8263
Margriet E van BaarBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5823-7375
Hendriët WandersDutch Association of Burn Survivors, 1941 AJ Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Angelique E A M Weel-KoendersErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1831-5129
Tsjitske M HaanstraDutch Burns Foundation, 1941 AJ Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Carine M H van SchieDutch Burns Foundation, 1941 AJ Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5069-7366
Paul P M van ZuijlenBurn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Cornelis H van der VliesBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eelke BosmaBurn Centre, Martini Hospital, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-9647
Corine A LansdorpDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inge SpronkBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-576X
Nancy E E Van LoeyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
On Behalf Of The National Burn Care Education Amp Research Group The Netherlands

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 10070022010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn care quality indicators are used to monitor and improve quality of care and for benchmark purposes. The perspectives of burn survivors, however, are not included in current sets of quality indicators while patient-centred care gains importance. The aim of this study was to explore burn survivors' perspectives on quality aspects of burn care, which was used to translate their perspectives into patient-centred quality of care indicators. Qualitative descriptive research was conducted in a patient panel group. First, thematic analysis was applied to the focus groups to identify overarching themes. Second, patient-centred quality indicators, informed by burn survivors' valued aspects of care, were defined. Ten burn survivors with an average age of 54 years (SD = 11; range 38-72 years) and mean TBSA burned of 14% (SD = 11%; range 5-35%) participated in two focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified, pointing to the importance of (1) information tailored to the different phases of recovery, (2) significant others' wellbeing and involvement, (3) a therapeutic relationship and low-threshold access to healthcare professionals and (4) to participate in decision-making. Eighteen patient-centred process quality of care indicators within nine aspects of care were formulated. The overarching themes are reflected in patient-centred quality indicators, which present a broadened and complementary view of existing clinical quality indicators for burn care. Evaluating these patient-centred quality indicators may increase quality of care and refine patient-centred care.

Indexed as

burnsfocus grouphealth carepatient-centered carequality indicatorswounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID39599946
PMCPMC11545247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.