Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599926›Full record

ArticleEuropean burn journal2023

Associations between Ethnicity and Referrals, Access and Engagement in a UK Adult Burns Clinical Psychology Service.

Laura Shepherd, Ishani Hari, Lauren Bamford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European burn journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura ShepherdDepartment of Clinical Psychology & Neuropsychology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-6596
Ishani HariAcademic Neuroscience Department, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Lauren BamfordDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnic inequalities exist across healthcare, including access to and experiences and outcomes of mental health services. Access to and engagement with burns clinical psychology services is essential for all patients. This study aimed to explore the ethnic diversity of adults referred to a burns clinical psychology service compared to those admitted to the burns service. It also aimed to investigate associations between ethnicity and indicators of access and engagement (receiving, declining or not attending psychological assessments, receiving psychological therapy and the number of therapy sessions completed). Routinely collected data over eight years were analysed. Analysis revealed an association between ethnicity and referral to the burns clinical psychology service. Patients from White British and Other ethnic backgrounds were less likely to be referred, whereas patients from Black and Asian ethnic groups were more likely to be referred. There were no statistically significant associations between ethnicity and receiving, declining or not attending psychological assessments or receiving psychological therapy. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of psychological therapy sessions received between the ethnic groups. Therefore, patients from ethnic minority groups did not appear to have significant difficulties engaging with the service but further research is recommended.

Indexed as

accessengagementethnic groupethnicitypsychologicalpsychologyreferral

Identifiers

PMID39599926
PMCPMC11571862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.