ArticleViruses2024
A Sensitivity and Consistency Comparison Between Next-Generation Sequencing and Sanger Sequencing in HIV-1 Pretreatment Drug Resistance Testing.
Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep sequencing reveals underestimated burden of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in people living with HIV: a global individual patient data meta-analysis.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Pooled it
- Challenges in Elucidating HIV-1 Genetic Diversity in the Middle East and North Africa: A Review Based on a Systematic Search.Viruses · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for HIV drug resistance (DR) testing has an increasing number of applications for the detection of low-abundance drug-resistant variants (LA-DRVs) in regard to its features as a quasi-species. However, there is less information on its detection performance in DR detection with NGS. To determine the feasibility of using NGS technology in LA-DRV detection for HIV-1 pretreatment drug resistance, 80 HIV-infected individuals who had never undergone antiretroviral therapy were subjected to both NGS and Sanger sequencing (SS) in HIV-1 drug resistance testing. The results reported in this study show that NGS exhibits higher sensitivity for drug resistance identification than SS at a 5% detection threshold. NGS showed a better consistency compared with that of SS for both protease inhibitors (PIs) and integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), with a figure amounting to more than 90%, but worse consistency in nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), with a consistency ranging from only 61.25% to 87.50%. The consistency of non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) between NGS and SS was around 85%. NGS showed the highest sensitivity of 87.0% at a 5% threshold. The application of NGS technology in HIV-1 genotype resistance detection in different populations infected with HIV requires further documentation and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.