Observational studyNutrients2024
Anchor-Based and Distributional Responsiveness of the Spanish Version of the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale in Older People with Dementia: A Longitudinal Study.
Observational study in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPatients with dementia present with feeding difficulties (FDs) since diagnosis, conditioning their progression. Early identification is vital for preventing deterioration due to nutritional problems. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale (EdFED) identifies the FDs of patients with dementia by studying their behaviours while eating or being fed. The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the EdFED over time in older people with cognitive impairment and to compare its effectiveness in identifying malnutrition and risk with that of the gold standard Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) method.
methodsThis was a multicentre, prospective, observational, longitudinal, analytic study with a follow-up period of 18 months (with patients participating in nursing homes and in the community). Sociodemographic and nutritional data (body mass index (BMI), MNA, forearm circumference (FC), calf circumference (CC), and a nutritional blood test) were collected; EdFED score was reported by nurses, nursing assistants, and family caregivers.
resultsThe total sample consisted of 359 individuals-60.7% residential participants and 39.3% community participants. In the last follow-up there were 149 remaining (41.5%). Malnutrition was more than 30%, and the risk was 40% at the three follow-ups. The results suggest that the EdFED scale is a useful tool for assessing feeding difficulties (FDs) in older persons with dementia. It demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity in detecting malnutrition, similar to the MNA, and, more importantly, detecting risk and also identifying changes in nutritional status over time.
conclusionsThe EdFED scale provides a means of evaluating nutritional problems, making it possible to work on prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.