Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599567›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluating the Effectiveness of External Molecular Proficiency Testing in the Global Polio Laboratory Network, 2021-2022.

Nancy Gerloff, Cara C Burns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nancy GerloffDivision of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-8318
Cara C BurnsDivision of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Global Poliovirus Laboratory Network (GPLN), participation and successful completion in annual proficiency test (PT) panels has been a part of the WHO accreditation process for decades. The PT panel is a molecular external quality assessment (mEQA) that evaluates laboratory preparedness, technical proficiency, the accuracy of data interpretation, and result reporting. Using the Intratypic Differentiation (ITD) real-time RT-PCR kits from CDC, laboratories run screening assays and report results in accordance with the ITD algorithm to identify and type polioviruses. The mEQA panels consisted of 10 blinded, non-infectious lyophilized RNA transcripts, including programmatically relevant viruses and targets contained in the real-time PCR assays. Sample identities included wildtype, vaccine-derived (VDPV), Sabin-like polioviruses, enterovirus, and negatives, as well as categories of invalid and indeterminate. The performance of individual laboratories was assessed based on the laboratory's ability to correctly detect and characterize the serotype/genotype identities of each sample. The scoring scheme assessed the laboratory readiness following GPLN guidelines. Laboratories receiving mEQA scores of 90 or higher passed the assessment, scores of less than 90 failed and required remedial actions and re-evaluation. In 2021 and 2022, 123 and 129 GPLN laboratories were invited to request the annual PT panel, and 118 and 127 laboratories submitted results, respectively. The overall results were good, with 86% and 91.5% of laboratories passing the PT panel on their first attempt in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Most labs scored the highest score of 100, and less than one quarter scored between 90 and 95. Less than 10% of submitting laboratories failed the PT, resulting in in-depth troubleshooting to identify root causes and remediations. Most of these laboratories were issued a second PT panel for repeat testing, and almost all laboratories passed the repeat PT panel. The results of the 2021 and 2022 annual mEQA PTs showed that, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the performance remained high in the GPLN, with most labs achieving the highest score. For these labs, the real-time PCR assay updates that were implemented during 2021-2022 were carried out with full adherence to procedures and algorithms. Even initially failing labs achieved passing scores after remediation.

Indexed as

Laboratory Proficiency TestingPoliomyelitisPoliovirusGlobal HealthHumansLaboratoriesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionaccreditationGlobal Polio Eradication Initiativemolecular external quality assessmentnucleic acid testingpoliovirusproficiency panel testingquality assurance programWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID39599567
PMCPMC11597380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.