ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024
An Overview of a Re-Emerging Disease in Italy: Bovine Tuberculosis Outbreaks in Cattle from MTBC-Free Territories.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on Risk Factors for Bovine Tuberculosis in the Disease-Free Regions of Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bovine tuberculosis source attribution using decision tree analysis: breakdown investigations in Italy (2022-2023).Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a zoonotic disease with consequences for public health as well as the economy. In the EU, compulsory eradication programmes have been applied, and most territories in Italy have been reported as disease-free (FTs). However, outbreaks (OBs), i.e., an officially confirmed occurrence of bTB in one or more animals in an establishment, have continued to be reported. In this study we provide an overview of bTB in terms of OB numbers in cattle from Italian FTs. Legislative sources were collected to find the FTs, the relevant declaration of free status year (FSY), and regional control and surveillance plans. Then, descriptive and statistical analyses were applied to the collected OBs. A total of 12 regions and 19 provinces were declared FTs in the 20 years from 2003 to 2023. Differences in regional plans were observed with respect to the percentages of herds that were annually controlled (control frequency). Overall, 370 OBs were recorded. A non-statistically significant decrease in the OB incidence rate after the FSY was declared. However, a notable increase in OBs detected at slaughterhouses after the FSY suggests that control systems (serological tests) at the herd level are not completely effective. Differences in the herds' control frequencies among FTs seem to not have had a significant influence on the observed OB number. The Tuscany region was the most affected FT based on the OB numbers after the FSY (especially in the last year). Epidemiologically relevant primary determinants seem to be the farming system (semi-extensive and adjacent herds) and the cattle movements from positive incidence areas (trade and animal fairs). The role of wild boars in the disease maintenance cannot be excluded. The results of this study stress the need to revise bTB eradication and surveillance plans based on risk analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.