ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024
AIpollen: An Analytic Website for Pollen Identification Through Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Plant Research.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in Mechanical Properties of Plant Cell Walls.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, deep learning has been widely applied to complex tasks such as computer vision and natural language processing, demonstrating its outstanding performance. This study aims to exploit the high precision and efficiency of deep learning to develop a system for the identification of pollen. To this end, we constructed a dataset across 36 distinct genera. In terms of model selection, we employed a pre-trained ResNet34 network and fine-tuned its architecture to suit our specific task. For the optimization algorithm, we opted for the Adam optimizer and utilized the cross-entropy loss function. Additionally, we implemented ELU activation function, data augmentation, learning rate decay, and early stopping strategies to enhance the training efficiency and generalization capability of the model. After training for 203 epochs, our model achieved an accuracy of 97.01% on the test set and 99.89% on the training set. Further evaluation metrics, such as an F1 score of 95.9%, indicate that the model exhibits good balance and robustness across all categories. To facilitate the use of the model, we develop a user-friendly web interface. Users can upload images of pollen grains through the URL link provided in this article) and immediately receive predicted results of their genus names. Altogether, this study has successfully trained and validated a high-precision pollen grain identification model, providing a powerful tool for the identification of pollen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.