ArticlePolymers2024
A Physics-Guided Machine Learning Model for Predicting Viscoelasticity of Solids at Large Deformation.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Assisted Viscoelastic Characterization of PC/ABS Blends via Multi-Frequency Dynamic Mechanical Analysis.Polymers · 2026Article
- AI-enabled, QbD-aligned Predictive, and Sustainable Design of Natural Polymer-based Drug Delivery Systems.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Identification of pear tissue mechanical parameters by integrating machine learning and optimization methods.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Gel-Based Additive Manufacturing: From Material Design to Process Optimization.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Polymers: A Review.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-guided machine learning (PGML) methods are emerging as valuable tools for modelling the constitutive relations of solids due to their ability to integrate both data and physical knowledge. While various PGML approaches have successfully modeled time-independent elasticity and plasticity, viscoelasticity remains less addressed due to its dependence on both time and loading paths. Moreover, many existing methods require large datasets from experiments or physics-based simulations to effectively predict constitutive relations, and they may struggle to model viscoelasticity accurately when experimental data are scarce. This paper aims to develop a physics-guided recurrent neural network (RNN) model to predict the viscoelastic behavior of solids at large deformations with limited experimental data. The proposed model, based on a combination of gated recurrent units (GRU) and feedforward neural networks (FNN), utilizes both time and stretch (or strain) sequences as inputs, allowing it to predict stress dependent on time and loading paths. Additionally, the paper introduces a physics-guided initialization approach for GRU-FNN parameters, using numerical stress-stretch data from the generalized Maxwell model for viscoelastic VHB polymers. This initialization is performed prior to training with experimental data, helping to overcome challenges associated with data scarcity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.