ReviewPolymers2024
Natural Antibacterial Compounds with Potential for Incorporation into Dental Adhesives: A Systematic Review.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial effect of a dental adhesive containing SCH-79797 onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Hexaallylaminocyclotriphosphazene-Modified Dental Compositions for 3D Printing of Dental Crowns.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental adhesives are essential in modern restorative dentistry and are constantly evolving. However, challenges like secondary caries from bacterial infiltration at the adhesive-tooth interface persist. While synthetic antibacterial agents in adhesives show promise, safety concerns have shifted interest toward natural options that are biocompatible, sustainable, and effective. Therefore, this study evaluated whether natural antibacterial compounds in dental adhesives can provide effective antimicrobial activity without compromising their integrity. This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 statement guidelines. Four databases were screened, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science, without language or publication date restrictions until July 2024. The selection criteria were in vitro studies in which natural antimicrobial substances were incorporated into dental adhesives and the resulting composites were tested for their antibacterial and physicochemical properties. A quality assessment was conducted on the selected studies. Most of the studies reviewed reported significant antibacterial activity while retaining the adhesive's integrity, generally achieved with lower concentrations of the natural agents. Higher concentrations increase the antimicrobial effectiveness but negatively impact the adhesive's properties. This review highlights the promising role of natural antibacterial compounds in enhancing the functionality of dental adhesives while also pointing to the need for continued research to address current challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.