Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599298›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Expanded Polystyrene/Tyre Crumbs Composites as Promising Aggregates in Mortar and Concrete.

Karamat Subhani, Krishnamurthy Prasad, Nishar Hameed, Mostafa Nikzad, Nisa V Salim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karamat SubhaniSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Krishnamurthy PrasadSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-4288
Nishar HameedSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Mostafa NikzadSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Nisa V SalimSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A composite material comprising expanded polystyrene (EPS), granulated tyre rubber (GTR), and a compatibilizer is demonstrated as a possible replacement for fine and coarse agglomerates in mortar and concrete systems, respectively. Two different polymer blending processes (solvent/low shear blending and melt/high shear blending) are used, and the resulting composite material utilized as aggregate to replace sand and cement for mortar and concrete block development. Critical properties such as workability, compressive and flexural strengths, water absorption, bulk density, and porosity are measured before and after aggregate replacement. The novel composite material led to significant improvements, boosting compressive strength by 7.6% and flexural strength by 18% when sand was replaced and further increasing compressive strength by 22.2% and flexural strength by 5.26% with cement replacement. However, a decrease in compressive and flexural strength was observed when plain EPS and plain GTR were used separately as aggregate replacements. This work proposes a pathway for the successful reincorporation of difficult-to-recycle materials such as EPS and GTR, otherwise destined for landfill, back into the supply chain for the construction industry. Moreover, this research represents the first reported work where the overall properties of mortar have surpassed those of standard mortar when substituted with recycled EPS or GTR.

Indexed as

blendingconcreteexpanded polystyrenegranulated tyre rubbermortarrecyclingsustainability

Identifiers

PMID39599298
PMCPMC11598471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.