ArticlePolymers2024
Viscoelastic Polyurethane Foam Biocomposites with Enhanced Flame Retardancy.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for viscoelastic polyurethane foams creates a need for new sustainable raw materials that support cost-effective production while maintaining the desired material performance and fire safety standards. In this regard, our study aimed to develop viscoelastic polyurethane foam composites with reduced flammability and a high proportion of renewable raw materials. To achieve this, blackcurrant pomace, expandable graphite and a third-generation blowing agent were introduced to a viscoelastic polyurethane foam composition containing a reactive flame retardant in the formulation. The effects of the incorporated additives on the foaming process, flammability, chemical structure, cellular structure, thermal properties and physico-mechanical properties of the composites were determined. The results showed that the viscoelastic foam composite containing 30 php of blackcurrant pomace and 15 php of expandable graphite had a pHRRmax 52% lower than that of the reference material. The additional use of a blowing agent enhanced the flame-retardant effect of the materials, resulting in a 67% reduction in pHRRmax of the composite compared to the reference material. Moreover, the developed biocomposites exhibited promising limiting oxygen index values of 26-28%, compared to the 21% shown for the reference sample. Consequently, the best-performing biocomposites achieved the V-0 flammability rating according to the UL-94 standard. This study's results indicate the composites' high application potential due to their reduced flammability and the materials' desirable physical and mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.