Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599218›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Analysis of the Optimum Performance for Polymer and Polymer-Nanocomposite-modified Asphalt by Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis.

Mustafa Alas, Shaban Ismael Albrka, Ahmed Eltwati, Ahmed Suliman B Ali, Allam Musbah Al Allam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mustafa AlasDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Near East University, Via Mersin 10, 99138 Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8988-2008
Shaban Ismael AlbrkaDepartment of Civil and Construction management, College of Engineering, A'Sharqiyah University, P.O. Box 42, Ibra 400, Oman.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-9127
Ahmed EltwatiDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Benghazi, Benghazi 12345, Libya.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-7544
Ahmed Suliman B AliSchool of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0747-0219
Allam Musbah Al AllamLibyan Centre for Engineering Research and Information Technology, Bani Walid 00218, Libya.ORCID 0009-0002-8338-3125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of Acrylate Styrene Acrylonitrile (ASA) and ASA/nanosilica (ASA/Si) additives was investigated by using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Firstly, an ASA polymer was blended with the virgin asphalt binder at two different concentrations (3% ASA and 5% ASA). After observing that 5% ASA was the optimum concentration for modification, nanosilica particles were further incorporated into the 5% ASA-modified asphalt binder with two different percentages (5% ASA 3%Si; 5% ASA 5%Si). Frequency sweep tests were conducted across various frequencies at elevated temperatures. The experimental outcomes were analyzed using master curves, rutting, and fatigue resistance parameter plots. Additionally, to provide a more holistic analysis, two different multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques, namely the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and the Technique for the Order of Preference by a Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), were conducted to identify the best-performing asphalt binder by considering three different parameters: workability, performance under different conditions, and cost. The frequency sweep tests showed that the 5% ASA 5%Si asphalt worked best in terms of resistance to rutting. On the other hand, the virgin binder performed better than all modified binders when it failed to resist fatigue. On the other hand, the PROMETHEE analysis identified the 5% ASA-modified asphalt binder as the optimal choice, while the TOPSIS analysis determined that the 5% ASA 3%Si-modified binder provided the best performance. The differences between the experimental results and the MCDA were due to using more than one evaluation parameter and looking at how well the asphalt binder worked at different temperature ranges at the same time.

Indexed as

ASAMCDAnanosilicaPROMETHEErutting and fatigue resistanceTOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID39599218
PMCPMC11598384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.