ArticlePolymers2024
Mechanical Behaviour of Green Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Sheep and Dog Wool from Serra Da Estrela.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental awareness has led industries and consumers to replace products derived from oil resources with products derived from natural sources. In the case of the composite materials industry, the replacement of synthetic fibres with natural fibres has increased in recent years. To study the influence that different types of natural fibres and different textile manufacturing techniques have on the mechanical properties of composites, bio-based epoxy matrix composites reinforced with different natural animal fibres were produced, some reinforced with sheep's wool and others with dog wool, which were later subjected to bending and tensile tests. From the authors' knowledge, there are few studies of composites produced with animal fibres, and even fewer with dog hair. The textile structures used as reinforcement were created using crochet, knitting, and weaving techniques. Prior to the composites production, the fibres were characterized by X-ray Diffraction (X-RD), and the yarns produced from these fibres were subjected to tensile tests. The results obtained suggest that the number of yarns and the diameter of the needles used during the production of the reinforcement have a significant impact on the mechanical properties of the composites. The green epoxy resin composites reinforced with sheep's wool exhibit higher values of flexural strength, tensile strength, and Young's modulus than those reinforced with dog wool, with average increases of 36.97%, 45.16%, and 72.99%, respectively. It was also possible to verify that the composites reinforced with woven fabrics and crocheted fabrics exhibit the highest values of tensile strength, flexural strength, and Young's modulus. Additionally, the composites reinforced with woven fabrics exhibit the highest values of deformation at first failure/break and toughness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.