ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Multi-Task Water Quality Colorimetric Detection Method Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accessible water quality monitoring through hybrid human-machine colorimetric methods.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The colorimetric method, due to its rapid and low-cost characteristics, demonstrates a wide range of application prospects in on-site water quality testing. Current research on colorimetric detection using deep learning algorithms predominantly focuses on single-target classification. To address this limitation, we propose a multi-task water quality colorimetric detection method based on YOLOv8n, leveraging deep learning techniques to achieve a fully automated process of "image input and result output". Initially, we constructed a dataset that encompasses colorimetric sensor data under varying lighting conditions to enhance model generalization. Subsequently, to effectively improve detection accuracy while reducing model parameters and computational load, we implemented several improvements to the deep learning algorithm, including the MGFF (Multi-Scale Grouped Feature Fusion) module, the LSKA-SPPF (Large Separable Kernel Attention-Spatial Pyramid Pooling-Fast) module, and the GNDCDH (Group Norm Detail Convolution Detection Head). Experimental results demonstrate that the optimized deep learning algorithm excels in precision (96.4%), recall (96.2%), and mAP50 (98.3), significantly outperforming other mainstream models. Furthermore, compared to YOLOv8n, the parameter count and computational load were reduced by 25.8% and 25.6%, respectively. Additionally, precision improved by 2.8%, recall increased by 3.5%, mAP50 enhanced by 2%, and mAP95 rose by 1.9%. These results affirm the substantial potential of our proposed method for rapid on-site water quality detection, offering new technological insights for future water quality monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.