Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599116›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Robustness of Deep-Learning-Based RF UAV Detectors.

Hilal Elyousseph, Majid Altamimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hilal ElyoussephElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-5429
Majid AltamimiElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9431-3774

Funding

Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia IFKSUOR3-462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of low-cost, small radar cross-section UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) necessitates innovative solutions for countering them. Since these UAVs typically operate with a radio control link, a promising defense technique involves passive scanning of the radio frequency (RF) spectrum to detect UAV control signals. This approach is enhanced when integrated with machine-learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) methods. Currently, this field is actively researched, with various studies proposing different ML/DL architectures competing for optimal accuracy. However, there is a notable gap regarding robustness, which refers to a UAV detector's ability to maintain high accuracy across diverse scenarios, rather than excelling in just one specific test scenario and failing in others. This aspect is critical, as inaccuracies in UAV detection could lead to severe consequences. In this work, we introduce a new dataset specifically designed to test for robustness. Instead of the existing approach of extracting the test data from the same pool as the training data, we allowed for multiple categories of test data based on channel conditions. Utilizing existing UAV detectors, we found that although coefficient classifiers have outperformed CNNs in previous works, our findings indicate that image classifiers exhibit approximately 40% greater robustness than coefficient classifiers under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. Specifically, the CNN classifier demonstrated sustained accuracy in various RF channel conditions not included in the training set, whereas the coefficient classifier exhibited partial or complete failure depending on channel characteristics.

Indexed as

computer visiondeep learningsignal processingspectrum monitoringUAV detection

Identifiers

PMID39599116
PMCPMC11597967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.