Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39599035›Full record

Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Application of Isokinetic Dynamometry Data in Predicting Gait Deviation Index Using Machine Learning in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Xiaolei Lu, Chenye Qiao, Hujun Wang, Yingqi Li, Jingxuan Wang, Congxiao Wang, Yingpeng Wang, Shuyan Qie

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaolei LuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Chenye QiaoBeijing Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Hujun WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-6657
Yingqi LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-8714
Jingxuan WangBeijing Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Congxiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Yingpeng WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Shuyan QieDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3600501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional gait analysis, supported by advanced sensor systems, is a crucial component in the rehabilitation assessment of post-stroke hemiplegic patients. However, the sensor data generated from such analyses are often complex and challenging to interpret in clinical practice, requiring significant time and complicated procedures. The Gait Deviation Index (GDI) serves as a simplified metric for quantifying the severity of pathological gait. Although isokinetic dynamometry, utilizing sophisticated sensors, is widely employed in muscle function assessment and rehabilitation, its application in gait analysis remains underexplored.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the use of sensor-acquired isokinetic muscle strength data, combined with machine learning techniques, to predict the GDI in hemiplegic patients. This study utilizes data captured from sensors embedded in the Biodex dynamometry system and the Vicon 3D motion capture system, highlighting the integration of sensor technology in clinical gait analysis.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional, observational study that included a cohort of 150 post-stroke hemiplegic patients. The sensor data included measurements such as peak torque, peak torque/body weight, maximum work of repeated actions, coefficient of variation, average power, total work, acceleration time, deceleration time, range of motion, and average peak torque for both flexor and extensor muscles on the affected side at three angular velocities (60°/s, 90°/s, and 120°/s) using the Biodex System 4 Pro. The GDI was calculated using data from a Vicon 3D motion capture system. This study employed four machine learning models-Lasso Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector regression (SVR), and BP Neural Network-to model and validate the sensor data. Model performance was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE), the coefficient of determination (R

resultsThe RF model outperformed others in predicting GDI, with an MSE of 16.18, an R

conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of integrating advanced sensor technology with machine learning techniques in the analysis of complex clinical data. The developed GDI prediction model, based on sensor-acquired isokinetic dynamometry data, offers a novel, streamlined, and effective tool for assessing rehabilitation progress in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, with promising implications for broader clinical application.

Indexed as

GaitMachine LearningStrokeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGait AnalysisHemiplegiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerStroke Rehabilitationgait deviation indexisokinetic dynamometrymachine learningsensorsstroke

Identifiers

PMID39599035
PMCPMC11598631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.