ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Investigation of Freeway Incident Duration Using Classification and Regression Trees Based on Multisource Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on a driving risk model for urban tunnel.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted contingency measures have proven highly effective at reducing the duration and harm caused by incidents. This study utilized the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) data mining technique to predict and quantify the duration of incidents. To achieve this, multisensor data collected from the Hangzhou freeway in China spanning from 2019 to 2021 was utilized to construct a regression tree with eight levels and 14 leaf nodes. By extracting 14 rules from the tree and establishing contingency measures based on these rules, accurate incident assessment and effective implementation of post-incident emergency plans were achieved. In addition, to more accurately apply the research findings to actual incidents, the CART method was compared with XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and AFT (accelerated failure time) models. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy of the CART model is better than the other three models. Furthermore, the CART method has strong interpretability. Interactions between explanatory variables, up to seven, are captured in the CART method, rather than merely analyzing the effect of individual variables on the incident duration, aligning more closely with actual incidents. This study has important practical implications for advancing the engineering application of machine learning methods and the analysis of sensor data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.