ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of Cluster Algorithms for Radar-Based Object Recognition in Autonomous and Assisted Driving.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NELD-EC: Neighborhood-Effective-Line-Density-Based Euclidean Clustering for Point Cloud Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perception systems for assisted driving and autonomy enable the identification and classification of objects through a concentration of sensors installed in vehicles, including Radio Detection and Ranging (RADAR), camera, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), ultrasound, and HD maps. These sensors ensure a reliable and robust navigation system. Radar, in particular, operates with electromagnetic waves and remains effective under a variety of weather conditions. It uses point cloud technology to map the objects in front of you, making it easy to group these points to associate them with real-world objects. Numerous clustering algorithms have been developed and can be integrated into radar systems to identify, investigate, and track objects. In this study, we evaluate several clustering algorithms to determine their suitability for application in automotive radar systems. Our analysis covered a variety of current methods, the mathematical process of these methods, and presented a comparison table between these algorithms, including Hierarchical Clustering, Affinity Propagation Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies (BIRCH), Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN), Mini-Batch K-Means, K-Means Mean Shift, OPTICS, Spectral Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture. We have found that K-Means, Mean Shift, and DBSCAN are particularly suitable for these applications, based on performance indicators that assess suitability and efficiency. However, DBSCAN shows better performance compared to others. Furthermore, our findings highlight that the choice of radar significantly impacts the effectiveness of these object recognition methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.