Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39598997›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluation of Cluster Algorithms for Radar-Based Object Recognition in Autonomous and Assisted Driving.

Daniel Carvalho de Ramos, Lucas Reksua Ferreira, Max Mauro Dias Santos, Evandro Leonardo Silva Teixeira, Leopoldo Rideki Yoshioka, João Francisco Justo, Asad Waqar Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Carvalho de RamosDepartment of Electronic, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, PR, Brazil.
Lucas Reksua FerreiraDepartment of Electronic, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3785-0095
Max Mauro Dias SantosDepartment of Electronic, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7877-3554
Evandro Leonardo Silva TeixeiraFaculty of Science and Technology in Engineering, University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-6782
Leopoldo Rideki YoshiokaPolytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2222-1237
João Francisco JustoPolytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1948-7835
Asad Waqar MalikDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University, 406 Hardy Road 216 Simrall Hall Mississippi State, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception systems for assisted driving and autonomy enable the identification and classification of objects through a concentration of sensors installed in vehicles, including Radio Detection and Ranging (RADAR), camera, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), ultrasound, and HD maps. These sensors ensure a reliable and robust navigation system. Radar, in particular, operates with electromagnetic waves and remains effective under a variety of weather conditions. It uses point cloud technology to map the objects in front of you, making it easy to group these points to associate them with real-world objects. Numerous clustering algorithms have been developed and can be integrated into radar systems to identify, investigate, and track objects. In this study, we evaluate several clustering algorithms to determine their suitability for application in automotive radar systems. Our analysis covered a variety of current methods, the mathematical process of these methods, and presented a comparison table between these algorithms, including Hierarchical Clustering, Affinity Propagation Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies (BIRCH), Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN), Mini-Batch K-Means, K-Means Mean Shift, OPTICS, Spectral Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture. We have found that K-Means, Mean Shift, and DBSCAN are particularly suitable for these applications, based on performance indicators that assess suitability and efficiency. However, DBSCAN shows better performance compared to others. Furthermore, our findings highlight that the choice of radar significantly impacts the effectiveness of these object recognition methods.

Indexed as

automotive applicationsautonomous vehiclescluster algorithmsDBSCANdriving assistanceK-MeansMean-Shiftobject identificationperception systemspoint cloudsradar sensor

Identifiers

PMID39598997
PMCPMC11598549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.