ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparative Study of Time Series Analysis Algorithms Suitable for Short-Term Forecasting in Implementing Demand Response Based on AMI.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Customer Baseline Credibility in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Incentive-Based Demand Response.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceiving Unpredictability for New Energy Power and Electricity Consumption Forecasting.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Dynamic Edge-Cloud Resource Allocation for Smart Cities and Smart Buildings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper compares four time series forecasting algorithms-ARIMA, SARIMA, LSTM, and SVM-suitable for short-term load forecasting using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) data. The primary focus is on evaluating the applicability and performance of these forecasting models in predicting electricity consumption patterns, which is a critical component for implementing effective demand response (DR) strategies. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability of each algorithm using a dataset of real-time electricity consumption collected from AMI systems over a designated period. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that each algorithm has distinct strengths and weaknesses depending on the characteristics of the dataset. Specifically, SVM exhibited superior performance in handling nonlinear patterns and high volatility, while SARIMA effectively captured seasonal trends. LSTM showed potential in modeling complex temporal dependencies but was sensitive to hyperparameter settings and required a substantial amount of training data. This research offers practical guidelines for selecting the optimal forecasting model based on data characteristics and application needs, contributing to the development of more efficient and dynamic energy management strategies. The findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced forecasting techniques into smart grid systems to enhance the reliability and responsiveness of DR programs. This study lays a solid foundation for future research on integrating these forecasting models into real-world AMI applications to support effective demand response and grid stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.