ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Machine Learning Applied to Reference Signal-Less Detection of Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmographic Signals: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Analysis on the Effect of Contact Pressure and Activity Level as Influencing Factors in PPG Sensor Performance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- AI-Driven and Automated Systems for Continuous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Long-Term Oxygen Therapy: Systematic Review.JMIRx med · 2026Review
- Pulse Oximetry-A Perioperative Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Validation of photoplethysmography-derived short-term heart rate variability using a wearable device.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Validity and Reliability of a Smart Band for Monitoring Cardiorespiratory Parameters in Children and Adolescents with Severe Cerebral Palsy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Determinants of photoplethysmography signal quality at the wrist.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Parameter-Efficient Deep Learning Models for Vital Sign Estimation From PPG.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms have brought remarkable advancements in detecting motion artifacts (MAs) from the photoplethysmogram (PPG) with no measured or synthetic reference data. However, no study has provided a synthesis of these methods, let alone an in-depth discussion to aid in deciding which one is more suitable for a specific purpose. This narrative review examines the application of machine learning techniques for the reference signal-less detection of MAs in PPG signals. We did not consider articles introducing signal filtering or decomposition algorithms without previous identification of corrupted segments. Studies on MA-detecting approaches utilizing multiple channels and additional sensors such as accelerometers were also excluded. Despite its promising results, the literature on this topic shows several limitations and inconsistencies, particularly those regarding the model development and testing process and the measures used by authors to support the method's suitability for real-time applications. Moreover, there is a need for broader exploration and validation across different body parts and a standardized set of experiments specifically designed to test and validate MA detection approaches. It is essential to provide enough elements to enable researchers and developers to objectively assess the reliability and applicability of these methods and, therefore, obtain the most out of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.