ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Time Series Classification for Predicting Biped Robot Step Viability.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of the stability of future steps taken by a biped robot is a very important task, since it allows the robot controller to adopt the necessary measures in order to minimize damages if a fall is predicted. We present a classifier to predict the viability of a given planned step taken by a biped robot, i.e., if it will be stable or unstable. The features of the classifier are extracted from a feature engineering process exploiting the useful information contained in the time series generated in the trajectory planning of the step. In order to state the problem as a supervised classification one, we need the ground truth class for each planned step. This is obtained using the Predicted Step Viability (PSV) criterion. We also present a procedure to obtain a balanced and challenging training/testing dataset of planned steps that contains many steps in the border between stable and non stable regions. Following this trajectory planning strategy for the creation of the dataset we are able to improve the robustness of the classifier. Results show that the classifier is able to obtain a 95% of ROC AUC for this demanding dataset using only four time series among all the signals required by PSV to check viability. This allows to replace the PSV stability criterion, which is safe, robust but impossible to apply in real-time, by a simple, fast and embeddable classifier that can run in real time consuming much less resources than the PSV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.