Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39598833›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of Sample Preparation and Detection Methods for the Quantification of Synthetic Musk Compounds (SMCs) in Carp Fish Samples.

Jungmin Jo, Eunjin Lee, Na Rae Choi, Ji Yi Lee, Jae Won Yoo, Dong Sik Ahn, Yun Gyong Ahn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jungmin JoDepartment of Environmental Science & Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.
Eunjin LeeDepartment of Environmental Science & Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.
Na Rae ChoiDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yi LeeDepartment of Environmental Science & Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9386-2133
Jae Won YooEnvironmental Research Group, Korea Institute of Coastal Ecology, Inc., Bucheon 14449, Republic of Korea.
Dong Sik AhnEnvironmental Research Group, Korea Institute of Coastal Ecology, Inc., Bucheon 14449, Republic of Korea.
Yun Gyong AhnMetropolitan Seoul Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, University-Industry Cooperation Building, 150 Bugahyeon-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03759, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4256-3824

Funding

Korea Basic Science Institute C484000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study deals with the separation and detection methods for 12 synthetic musk compounds (SMCs), which are some of the emerging contaminants in fish samples, are widely present in environmental media, and can be considered serious risks due to their harmful effects. For the separation of co-extracted substances and the target SMCs in fish samples after ultrasonic extraction, four solid-phase extraction (SPE) sorbents were investigated. The recoveries of SMCs from 10 mL of eluent, as optimized by the elution profile, were within the acceptable range of 80-120% in all SPE types, and it was found that nitro musk and polycyclic musk compounds were separated more clearly in Florisil SPE than others (Aminopropyl, Alumina-N, PSA). Furthermore, the results of measuring the matrix effects by each SPE through the spiking experiments showed that Florisil SPE was superior. The comparison of a gas chromatograph-single quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC-SQ/MS) with selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode and GC-triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC-QqQ-MS/MS) with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes regarding the detection method of SMCs showed that the method detection limits (MDLs) of SMCs were on average ten times lower when GC-QqQ-MS/MS with MRM mode was used. The differences between the two methods can provide essential information for selecting an analytical method in related research fields that require appropriate detection levels, such as risk assessment or pollution control.

Indexed as

CarpsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometrySolid Phase ExtractionAnimalsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFood ContaminationLimit of DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryWater Pollutants, ChemicalFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedmuskWater Pollutants, Chemicalcarp fish samplesgas chromatograph-single quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC-SQ/MS)gas chromatograph-triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC-QqQ-MS/MS)solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanupsynthetic musk compounds (SMCs)

Identifiers

PMID39598833
PMCPMC11597492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.