ReviewPharmaceutics2024
Nanotechnology in Pain Management.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can therapeutic potency of a cancer nanomedicine be predicted by pain-related behavioral test in subcutaneous tumor model?International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Review
- Targeting molecular pathways in neuropathic cancer pain: from mechanisms to novel therapeutics.iScience · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology for pain management in orthopedic surgery.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
- Emerging role of macrophages in neuropathic pain.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that affects millions of patients worldwide, contributing to a high disease burden and millions of dollars in lost wages, missed workdays, and healthcare costs. Opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants are the most used medications for chronic pain and carry significant side effects, including gastric bleeding, hepatotoxicity, stroke, kidney damage, constipation, dizziness, and arrhythmias. Opioids in particular carry the risk of long-term dependence, drug tolerance, and overdose. In 2022, 81,806 people died from opioid overdose in the United States alone. Alternative treatments for chronic pain are critically needed, and nanotechnology has emerged as a promising means of achieving effective long-term analgesia while avoiding the adverse side effects associated with conventional pharmacological agents. Nanotechnology-based treatments include liposomes, Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) and other polymeric nanoparticles, and carbon-based polymers, which can help mitigate those adverse side effects. These nanomaterials can serve as drug delivery systems that facilitate controlled release and drug stability via the encapsulation of free molecules and protein-based drugs, leading to longer-lasting analgesia and minimizing side effects. In this review, we examine the role of nanotechnology in addressing concerns associated with conventional chronic pain treatments and discuss the ongoing efforts to develop novel, nanotechnology-based treatments for chronic pain such as nanocapacitor patches, gene therapy, the use of both viral and non-viral vectors, CRISPR, and scavengers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.