ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Initial Evaluation of Safety and Immunomodulatory Potential of Dietary Supplementation with Mangosteen Pericarp Extract for Sustainable Meat Production in Native Crossbred Chickens.
Phruedrada Kaewtui, Chompunut Lumsangkul, Apinya Satsook, Korawan Sringarm, Chaiwat Arjin, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Pimporn Khamtavee, Orranee Srinual, Montri Punyatong, Kiattisak Huanhong and 4 more
Abstract read
In one paragraphArticle in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
14 authors.
Phruedrada KaewtuiDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chompunut LumsangkulDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-5306 Apinya SatsookDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-4047 Korawan SringarmDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0089-8183 Chaiwat ArjinDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6297-2890 Wanaporn TapingkaeDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4836-0817 Pimporn KhamtaveeDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Orranee SrinualDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3657-3268 Montri PunyatongDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Kiattisak HuanhongDepartment of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0007-2639-3059 Peerawit ChongrattanameteekulVeterinary Academic Office, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0009-6690-0232 Natpasit RattaworapanitVeterinary Academic Office, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0009-8450-2633 Thanawut MangkangVeterinary Academic Office, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Raktham MektriratVeterinary Academic Office, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7429-0993 Funding
National Research Council of Thailand 900187
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The utilization of mangosteen biomass not only solves environmental problems but also raises the value of agricultural waste. The current study aimed to evaluate the potential of mangosteen pericarp extract (MPE) for enhancing the immunity and productivity of Thai native crossbred chickens on-farm. A total of 180 three-week-old chickens were divided into negative control and supplemented groups, with 1000 mg MPE/kg of diet. The safety of MPE was further confirmed by the absence of noticeable differences in mortality and biochemical parameters during the entire study period. The MPE-supplemented group displayed significant differences in the relative transcription levels of IL-10 compared to the basal diet group (
Indexed as
feed additivefood productionfood securitygrowth performancemangosteenmeat qualitypoultrysustainability
Identifiers
PMID39598280
PMCPMC11595714
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390