ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Post-Carotid Artery Stenting Hyperperfusion Syndrome in a Hypotensive Patient: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The predictive value of cerebral blood flow perfusion for cSAH following flow-restricting head and neck artery angioplasty.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Analysis of factors influencing cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after stent thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious post-procedural complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The pathophysiological mechanisms of CHS in the absence of arterial hypertension (AH) remain only partially understood. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using the terms »cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome«, »hypotension«, »hyperperfusion«, »stroke«, »intracranial hemorrhages«, »risk factors«, »carotid revascularization«, »carotid stenting«, »carotid endarterectomy«, »blood-brain barrier«, »endothelium«, »contrast encephalopathy«, and combinations. We present a case of a normotensive female patient who developed CHS post-CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis while being hypotensive with complete recovery. We identified 393 papers, among which 65 were deemed relevant to the topic. The weighted average prevalence of CHS after CAS is 1.2% [0.0-37.7%] with that of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being 0.51% [0-9.3%]. Recently symptomatic carotid stenosis or contralateral carotid revascularization, urgent intervention, acute carotid occlusion, contralateral ≥70% stenosis, and the presence of leptomeningeal collaterals were associated with CHS. A prolonged hemodynamic instability after CAS conveys a higher risk for CHS. However, none of the articles mentioned isolated hypotension as a risk factor for CHS. Whereas mortality after ICH post-CAS ranges from 40 to 75%, in the absence of ICH, CHS generally carries a good prognosis. AH is not obligatory in CHS development. Even though impaired cerebral autoregulation and post-revascularization changes in cerebral hemodynamics seem to play a pivotal role in CHS pathophysiology, our case highlights the complexity of CHS, involving factors like endothelial dysfunction and sudden reperfusion. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and management approaches for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.