ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Efficacy of Mammographic Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of an artificial intelligence-based system for mammography in the compulsory medical insurance program: results of a 3-year study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the potential of an AI-based computer-aided detection (AI-CAD) system in digital mammography for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). A retrospective analysis of 132 patients who underwent NAC and surgery between January 2020 and December 2022 was performed. Pre- and post-NAC mammograms were analyzed using conventional CAD and AI-CAD systems, with negative exams defined by the absence of marked abnormalities. Two radiologists reviewed mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Concordance rates between CAD and AI-CAD were calculated, and the diagnostic performance, including the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), was assessed. The pre-NAC concordance rates were 90.9% for CAD and 97% for AI-CAD, while post-NAC rates were 88.6% for CAD and 89.4% for AI-CAD. The MRI had the highest diagnostic performance for pCR prediction, with AI-CAD performing comparably to other modalities. Univariate analysis identified significant predictors of pCR, including AI-CAD, mammography, ultrasound, MRI, histologic grade, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67. In multivariable analysis, negative MRI, histologic grade 3, and HER2 positivity remained significant predictors. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that AI-CAD in digital mammography shows the potential to examine the pCR of breast cancer patients following NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.