ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Work of Breathing for Aviators: A Missing Link in Human Performance.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breathin' on the edge - the hidden complexity of pilot breathing regulators.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we explore the work of breathing (WoB) experienced by aviators during the Anti-G Straining Maneuver (AGSM) to improve pilot safety and performance. Traditional airflow models of WoB fail to adequately distinguish between breathing rate and inspiratory frequency, leading to potentially inaccurate assessments. This mismatch can have serious implications, particularly in critical flight situations where understanding the true respiratory workload is essential for maintaining performance. To address these limitations, we used a non-sinusoidal model that captures the complexities of WoB under high inspiratory frequencies and varying dead space conditions. Our findings indicate that the classical airflow model tends to underestimate WoB, particularly at elevated inspiratory frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 2 Hz, where resistive forces play a significant role and elastic forces become negligible. Additionally, we show that an increase in dead space, coupled with high-frequency breathing, elevates WoB, heightening the risk of dyspnea among pilots. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that higher breathing rates lead to a decrease in total WoB, an unexpected finding suggesting that refining breathing patterns could help pilots optimize their energy expenditure. This research highlights the importance of examining the relationship between alveolar ventilation, breathing rate, and inspiratory frequency in greater depth within realistic flight scenarios. These insights indicate the need for targeted training programs and adaptive life-support systems to better equip pilots for managing respiratory challenges in high-stress situations. Ultimately, our research lays the groundwork for enhancing respiratory support for aviators, contributing to safer and more efficient flight operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.