Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39597917›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Challenges and Considerations in Diagnosing and Managing p16+-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC) with Neck Metastasis: Implications of p16 Positivity, Tobacco Exposure, and De-Escalation Strategies.

Giovanni Motta, Benedetta Brandolini, Tonia Di Meglio, Salvatore Allosso, Massimo Mesolella, Filippo Ricciardiello, Marco Bocchetti, Domenico Testa, Gaetano Motta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovanni MottaENT Unit, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Benedetta BrandoliniENT Unit, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Tonia Di MeglioENT Unit, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Salvatore AllossoOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-4711
Massimo MesolellaOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-1552
Filippo RicciardielloEar, Nose and Throat Unit, AORN "Antonio Cardarelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7235-2804
Marco BocchettiDepartment of Life and Health Sciences, Link Campus University, Via del Casale di San Pio V 44, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Domenico TestaENT Unit, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-3652
Gaetano MottaENT Unit, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of patients showing neck metastasis and no obvious primary tumor at the initial diagnostic evaluation or neck cancer of unknown primary (NCUP) is rising. It is estimated that a relevant part of these tumors arises in the tonsillar crypts or base of the tongue and are p16+-related. However, today, the detection rate of the primary tumor is suboptimal. Identifying the primary tumor and its biomolecular characterization is essential since it influences the treatment administered, possibly reducing radiation fields and providing de-escalation to primary surgical management. However, p16 IHC (immunohistochemistry) might not be sufficient to diagnose HPV-related OPSCC. The other subset of patients discussed are the HPV-positive patients who have a history of tobacco exposure and/or p53 mutations. Possible factors that could negatively influence the outcomes of these patients are investigated and discussed below. So, this paper aims to analyze the diagnostic, bio-molecular, clinico-radiological, morphological, prognostic and therapeutical aspects of p16-positive OPSCC, highlighting the possible bias that can occur during the diagnostic and prognostic process.

methodsA narrative review was conducted to investigate the biases in the diagnostic and therapeutic process of two groups of patients: those who are p16-positive but HPV-negative patients, and those who are p16-positive and HPV-positive with exposure to traditional risk factors and/or p53 mutations. The keywords used for the literature research included the following: NCUP, OPSCC, p16IHC, HPV testing, p16 positive HPV negative OPSCC, p16 positive HPV positive OPSCC, tonsillectomy, tobacco exposure, p53 mutations, cystic neck metastasis, extranodal extension (ENE), radiotherapy, de-escalation and neck neck dissection.

resultsHPV-positive OPSCC has specific clinico-radiological features. Bilateral tonsillectomy should be considered for the identification of the primary tumor. P16 IHC alone is not sufficient for diagnosing HPV-related OPSCC; additional detection methods are required. The role of tobacco exposure and p53 mutations should be investigated especially in cases of HPV-positive tumors. Extranodal extension (ENE) must be taken into consideration in the prognostic staging of HPV-positive tumors. Surgical primary treatment involving neck dissection (ND) and bilateral tonsillectomy followed by adjuvant radiation may represent the most appropriate approach for N3 cases. Diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutical implications must be addressed considering clinical, biomolecular and morphological aspects. At least today, the numerous biases that are still present influencing the diagnostic and prognostic process do not permit considering de-escalation protocols.

conclusionsA precise and accurate diagnosis is required in order to adequately stage and manage p16+ OPSCC, particularly with neck metastasis. The role of tobacco exposure and/or p53 mutations must be considered not only in p16+ OPSCC but especially in HPV-positive OPSCC. Until a more accurate diagnosis is possible, ENE should be considered even in p16+HPV+ OPSCC. Primary surgery with unilateral ND and bilateral tonsillectomy might be the treatment of choice given the numerous diagnostic and prognostic pitfalls. Therefore, it is inappropriate and risky to propose de-escalation protocols in routine clinical practice due to the risk of undertreatment.

Indexed as

cystic neck metastasisde-escalationextranodal extension (ENE)HPV testingNCUPneck dissectionOPSCCp16 IHCp16-positive HPV-negative OPSCCp16-positive-HPV-positive OPSCCp53radiotherapytobacco exposuretonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID39597917
PMCPMC11595031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.