ArticleMicroorganisms2024
A Comparative Analysis of the Ocular Microbiome: Insights into Healthy Eyes and Anophthalmic Sockets.
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to characterize the ocular surface microbiota of patients with an anophthalmic cavity. An eNAT with 1 mL of Liquid Amies Medium was used to collect samples. Microbial DNA from anophthalmic socket and healthy fellow control eye samples was isolated and sequenced. Raw reads were analyzed with GAIA (v 2.02). The richness and Shannon alpha diversity metrics, as well as Bray-Curtis beta diversity and Wilcoxon signed-rank test values, were computed with R packages such as phyloseq, mia, or DESeq2 to allow for microbiome analysis. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using the function plotReducedDim from the R package scater. The different taxonomic profiles were described under the concept of eye community state type (ECST). The microbiomes of both eyes from 25 patients with an anophthalmic cavity were analyzed in this study. While the microbial communities of paired eyes from the same patients showed notable dissimilarity, no consistent patterns emerged when comparing healthy eyes to anophthalmic sockets. Alpha diversity values did not significantly differ between healthy eyes and anophthalmic socket samples, though there was considerable variability within each group. Notably, anophthalmic socket samples generally exhibited lower abundances of genera such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.