Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39597429›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Experimental Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Foams Under Quasi-Static Compressive Loads.

Krzysztof Wacławiak, Jerzy Myalski, Debela N Gurmu, Goftila G Sirata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krzysztof WacławiakFaculty of Materials Engineering, Department of Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland.
Jerzy MyalskiFaculty of Materials Engineering, Department of Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland.
Debela N GurmuFaculty of Materials Engineering, Department of Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-1986-7215
Goftila G SirataFaculty of Materials Engineering, Department of Materials Technologies, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article sought to determine the response of a carbon foam material derived from polyurethane foam when subjected to a quasi-static compression load. The effects of the foam pore densities and additives (solvents) on the compression strength, compressive modulus, and surface morphology of the carbon foam were investigated. In this study, three different carbon foam pore densities (20, 40, and 60 ppi) and three solvents for the phenol-formaldehyde resins that coated the polymer foam (acetone, ethanol, and methanol) were used. Carbon foams were derived from polyurethane foams by carbonization. Quasi-static compression testing was carried out using a universal testing machine. The compressive strength, compressive modulus, and relative density of these different carbon foams were computed and compared. Two-way ANOVA analyses were performed to compare the significance of solvents and pore density. These results showed that pore density and solvents significantly affected the compressive strength, compressive modulus, and surface morphology of the fabricated polyurethane-derived carbon foam. Finally, the maximum compressive strength and maximum compressive modulus were observed in carbon foam (60 ppi) with 40% methanol as the solvent. Conversely, a minimum compressive strength was observed for a 20 ppi carbon foam with a 20% acetone solvent, and a minimum compressive modulus was observed for a 20 ppi foam with 40% methanol. Lastly, the chemical composition of the polyurethane foams was investigated, and these results indicated that the polyurethane-derived carbon foam had 96% carbon atoms after carbonization.

Indexed as

carbon foamcarbonizationcellular materialsfailure mechanism

Identifiers

PMID39597429
PMCPMC11595887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.