ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Influence of Extra-Fine Milling Protocol on the Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Composite and Ceramic Crowns.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intaglio Surface Accuracy of Temporary Crowns Fabricated by Additive Versus Subtractive CAD/CAM Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of spacer and milling strategy on CAD/CAM ceramic crown fit and load-bearing capacity.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns milled using two different milling protocols (fine or extra-fine) within a 4-axis milling machine. The crowns were fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) and resin composite (Tetric CAD), assessing their fit in various regions. The crowns (N = 40, n = 10) were milled from lithium disilicate and resin composite using a CEREC Primemill unit. Four groups were formed based on the material and milling protocol: EFLD (extra-fine lithium disilicate), FLD (fine lithium disilicate), EFRC (extra-fine resin composite), and FRC (fine resin composite). The crowns were measured using the replica technique, evaluating internal and marginal adaptation in 18 measuring points per specimen. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Resin composite crowns demonstrated a significantly better internal fit compared to lithium disilicate (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.