ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Data-Driven Bi-Directional Lattice Property Customization and Optimization.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on Additively Manufactured Porous Structures of Nickel-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Materials Science and Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Customizing and optimizing lattice materials poses a challenge to designers. This study proposed a data-driven generative method to customize and optimize lattice material. The method utilizes subdivision modeling to parametrically describe lattice morphologies and skeletons. Next, the homogenization method is employed to analyze elastic moduli for collecting a dataset. Then, a two-tiered machine learning (ML) framework is proposed to predict the elastic modulus for a forward design. The first-tier model employs polynomial regression to estimate relative density, which serves as an additional input feature for the second-tier model. The prediction accuracy of the second-tier model is improved through the additional inputs. The forward and reverse design strategies offer a flexible and accurate means of tailoring lattice properties to meet specific performance requirements. Two case studies demonstrate the practical value of the framework: customizing a lattice material to achieve a desired elastic modulus and optimizing the mechanical performance of lattice materials under relative density constraints. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the elastic modulus using the two-tiered ML model achieved an error of less than 10% compared to finite element analysis, demonstrating the reliability of the proposed approach. Furthermore, the optimization design achieved up to a 25% improvement in mechanical performance compared to conventional lattice configurations under the same relative density constraints. These findings underscore the advantages of combining generative design, machine learning, and genetic algorithms to navigate complex design spaces and achieve enhanced material performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.