ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Cordenka and Ramie Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The depletion of conventional materials and their adverse environmental impacts have prompted a shift toward sustainable alternatives in composite materials engineering. In pursuit of this objective, this study investigated the mechanical properties of polypropylene matrix composites reinforced with Cordenka, an artificial cellulose fiber, and compared them to those reinforced with ramie, a natural cellulose fiber. Continuous strand composites were developed using the Multi-Pin-assisted Resin Infiltration (M-PaRI) process. The strands were subsequently sectioned into 15 mm lengths and injection-molded into dumbbell and strip specimens for mechanical characterization. The results showed that 20 wt% Cordenka/PP composites exhibited a tensile strength of 68.7 MPa, 2.04 times higher than neat PP and 1.66 times greater than the 20 wt% ramie/PP composites. Impact testing further demonstrated that Cordenka/PP composites absorbed 2 to 2.5 times more impact energy than ramie/PP composites, regardless of the presence of notches. Fiber length analysis indicated that Cordenka fibers maintained their length beyond the critical fiber length, allowing for efficient stress transfer and acting as a more effective reinforcement compared to ramie fibers, which were below this threshold. Consequently, the Cordenka/PP composites exhibited significantly enhanced mechanical performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed fewer fiber pullouts in ramie-reinforced composites, suggesting superior interfacial adhesion to the PP matrix, although it did not translate to higher mechanical properties. These findings underscore the potential of Cordenka as a sustainable alternative to synthetic, non-biodegradable fibers in PP composites, providing improved mechanical properties and promising prospects for advanced composite applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.