ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Broaching Digital Twin to Predict Forces, Local Overloads, and Surface Topography Irregularities.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Broaching is a key manufacturing process that directly influences the surface integrity of critical components, impacting their functional performance in sectors such as aeronautics, automotive, and energy. Such components are subjected to severe conditions, including high thermomechanical loads, fatigue, and corrosion. For this reason, the development of predictive models is essential for determining the optimal tool design and machining conditions to ensure proper in-service performance. This study, therefore, presents a broaching digital twin based on hybrid modelling, which combines analytical, numerical, and empirical approaches to provide rapid and accurate predictions of the forces per tooth, local overloads, and surface topography irregularities. The digital twin was validated with a critical industrial case study involving fir-tree broaching of turbine discs made of forged and age-hardened Inconel 718. The accuracy of the digital twin was demonstrated by the results: the average error in force predictions was below 10%, and the model effectively identified the most critical teeth and zones prone to failure. It also predicted surface topography irregularities with an error of less than 15%. Interestingly, the relationship between surface topography irregularities and surface residual stress variations across the machined surface was observed experimentally for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.