ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Durability of Forging Tools Used in the Hot Closed Die Forging Process-A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme Tool Steels for Die Forging.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Forming Technologies and Mechanical Properties of Advanced Materials-Second Edition.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review of Methods for Increasing the Durability of Hot Forging Tools.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Thermal Management in Multi-Stage Hot Forging: Computational Advances in Contact and Spray-Cooling Modelling.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Corrosion Behavior of Shot Peened Ti6Al4V Alloy Fabricated by Conventional and Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The article presents the classification of the wear mechanisms of forging tools. The durability of dies can be enhanced through a variety of methods, including the selection of appropriate hot working tool steel, the application of effective heat treatment, the utilization of advanced surface engineering techniques, and the incorporation of lubricating and cooling agents. Two popular methods of tool regeneration, such as re-profiling and laser regeneration, are presented. The issue of numerical wear prediction based on the Archard model, the correlation of this model with experimental results, low-cycle fatigue (HTLCF), and an alternative method based on artificial neural networks are discussed. The paper aims to present currently known wear mechanisms and the methods of increasing and predicting tool durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.