ArticleMicromachines2024
Spatial Discrimination Limit Analysis of Macrophage Phagocytosis Between Target Antigens and Non-Target Objects Using Microcapillary Manipulation Assay.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microneedle-Based Analysis Reveals Polarity-Dependent Spatial Regulation of Macrophage Phagocytosis.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During phagocytosis, the FcGR-IgG bond is thought to be necessary to promote cell-membrane extension as the zipper mechanism. However, does this zipper mechanism provide a spatial antigen discrimination capability that allows macrophages to selectively phagocytose only antigens, especially for clusters with a mixture of antigens and non-antigens? To elucidate the ability and limitation of the zipper mechanism, we fed a coupled 2 μm IgG-coated and 4.5 μm non-coated polystyrene bead mixtures to macrophages and observed their phagocytosis. Macrophage engulfed the mixed clusters, including the 4.5 μm non-coated polystyrene part, indicating that the non-coated particles can be engulfed even without the zipper mechanism as far as coupled to the opsonized particles. In contrast, when the non-opsonized particle part was held by the microcapillary manipulation assay, macrophages pinched off the non-coated polystyrene particle part and internalized the opsonized particle part only. The results suggest that (1) an IgG-coated surface is needed to anchor phagocytosis by cell-membrane protrusion; however, (2) once the antibody-dependent cell phagocytosis is started, phagocytosis can proceed with the uncoated objects as the followers of the internalizing opsonized particles even without the support of the zipper mechanism. They may also indicate the concern of misleading the immune system to target unexpected objects because of their aggregation with target pathogens and the possibility of new medical applications to capture the non-opsonized target objects by the aggregation with small antigens to activate an immune response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.