ArticleMicromachines2024
Proposal of a Rapid Detection System Using Image Analysis for ELISA with an Autonomous Centrifugal Microfluidic System.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, with the aim of adapting an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system for point-of-care testing (POCT), we propose an image analysis method for ELISAs using a centrifugal microfluidic device that automatically executes the assay. The developed image analysis method can be used to quantify the color development reaction on a TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine) substrate. In a conventional ELISA, reaction stopping reagents are required at the end of the TMB reaction. In contrast, the developed image analysis method can analyze color in the color-developing reaction without a reaction stopping reagent. This contributes to a reduction in total assay time. The microfluidic devices used in this study could execute reagent control for ELISAs by steady rotation. In the demonstration of the assay and image analysis, a calibration curve for mouse IgG detection was successfully prepared, and it was confirmed that the image analysis method had the same performance as the conventional analysis method. Moreover, the changes in the amount of color over time confirmed that a calibration curve equal to the endpoint analysis was obtained within 2 min from the start of the TMB reaction. As the assay time before the TMB reaction was approximately 7.5 min, the developed ELISA system could detect TMB in just 10 min. In conventional methods using a plate reader, the assay required a time of 90 min for manual handling using microwell plates, and in the case of using automatic microfluidic devices, 30 min were required. The time of 10 min realized by this proposed method is equal to the time required for detection in an immunochromatographic assay with a lateral flow assay; therefore, it is expected that ELISAs can be performed sufficiently to adapt to POCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.