ArticleMicromachines2024
An Image Processing Approach to Quality Control of Drop-on-Demand Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) Printing.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Droplet quality in drop-on-demand (DoD) Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) inkjet printing plays a crucial role in influencing the overall performance and manufacturing quality of the operation. The current approach to droplet printing analysis involves manually outlining/labeling the printed dots on the substrate under a microscope and then using microscope software to estimate the dot sizes by assuming the dots have a standard circular shape. Therefore, it is prone to errors. Moreover, the dot spacing information is missing, which is also important for EHD DoD printing processes, such as manufacturing micro-arrays. In order to address these issues, the paper explores the application of feature extraction methods aimed at identifying characteristics of the printed droplets to enhance the detection, evaluation, and delineation of significant structures and edges in printed images. The proposed method involves three main stages: (1) image pre-processing, where edge detection techniques such as Canny filtering are applied for printed dot boundary detection; (2) contour detection, which is used to accurately quantify the dot sizes (such as dot perimeter and area); and (3) centroid detection and distance calculation, where the spacing between neighboring dots is quantified as the Euclidean distance of the dot geometric centers. These stages collectively improve the precision and efficiency of EHD DoD printing analysis in terms of dot size and spacing. Edge and contour detection strategies are implemented to minimize edge discrepancies and accurately delineate droplet perimeters for quality analysis, enhancing measurement precision. The proposed image processing approach was first tested using simulated EHD printed droplet arrays with specified dot sizes and spacing, and the achieved quantification accuracy was over 98% in analyzing dot size and spacing, highlighting the high precision of the proposed approach. This approach was further demonstrated through dot analysis of experimentally EHD-printed droplets, showing its superiority over conventional microscope-based measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.