ArticleMicromachines2024
In Situ Potentiometric Monitoring of Nitrate Removal from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbon and Ion Exchange Resin.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ion-Selective Electrodes for Ammonium and Nitrate Determination: Recent Advances, Trends and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A nitrate selective electrode was used for real-time in situ potentiometric monitoring of a batch nitrate removal process using activated carbon and ion exchange resin. A plasticized polymeric membrane consisting of polyvinyl chloride, 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether and tridodecyl methyl ammonium chloride was incorporated into an ion-selective electrode body. First, the dynamic potential response of the electrode to nitrate was investigated. Two commercial activated carbons with different physical properties were then tested. Nitrate removal with these carbons was monitored potentiometrically using several nitrate concentrations. The extreme turbidity of the solutions was not a drawback during potentiometric monitoring of the process, which is a clear advantage over other methods such as optical monitoring. The potential versus time recordings were converted into nitrate concentration versus time plots, which were evaluated with different adsorption kinetic models. A pseudo-second order kinetic model for nitrate adsorption on both activated carbons was found to fit the experimental data very well. The values of the kinetic parameters were very different between the two activated carbons. The proposed methodology was also satisfactorily applied to the study of nitrate removal by an ion exchange resin. In this case, the experimental results clearly follow a pseudo-first order kinetic model. Potential applications of the proposed methodology for monitoring nitrate removal in real water samples are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.