ReviewMicromachines2024
CMOS Point-of-Care Diagnostics Technologies: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.
Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mini Review on the Epidemiology, Transmission, and Clinical Features of Monkeypox Virus.African health sciences · 2026Review
- Single-Die-Level MEMS Post-Processing for Prototyping CMOS-Based Neural Probes Combined with Optical Fibers for Optogenetic Neuromodulation.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Agitation, Alzheimer's disease, and autophagy: mechanistic insights into aging pathways, gut microbiome, and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- WoundMx: multiplexed detection of wound infection biomarkers with a multimodal sensor system based on laser-induced graphene.NPJ 2D materials and applications · 2026Article
- SUBTRACTIVE NANOFLUIDICS IN 65-NM CMOS COPPER BEOL ACHIEVE 100-NM WIDTH.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems · 2026Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Flexible pH Sensors Based on Pulsed Laser-Ablated Graphene/MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review provides a comprehensive overview of point-of-care (PoC) devices across several key diagnostic applications, including blood analysis, infectious disease detection, neural interfaces, and commercialized integrated circuits (ICs). In the blood analysis section, the focus is on biomarkers such as glucose, dopamine, and aptamers, and their respective detection techniques. The infectious disease section explores PoC technologies for detecting pathogens, RNA, and DNA, highlighting innovations in molecular diagnostics. The neural interface section reviews advancements in neural recording and stimulation for therapeutic applications. Finally, a survey of commercialized ICs from companies such as Abbott and Medtronic is presented, showcasing existing PoC devices already in widespread clinical use. This review emphasizes the role of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology in enabling compact, efficient diagnostic systems and offers insights into the current and future landscape of PoC devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.