Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39597050›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse: A Review.

Wing Lam Tsui, Dah-Ching Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wing Lam TsuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan.
Dah-Ching DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly in the anterior compartment, is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts women's quality of life. Two common surgical approaches for managing anterior vaginal wall prolapse are anterior colporrhaphy and paravaginal repair. Anterior colporrhaphy, a traditional technique, involves the plication of weakened fascial tissues to restore support to the bladder and anterior vaginal wall. Paravaginal repair addresses lateral detachment of the anterior vaginal wall by reattaching it to its supportive structures. This review aimed to compare the indications, techniques, and outcomes between these surgical methods, discussing their efficacy, recurrence rates, and complications. Although anterior colporrhaphy is widely used, paravaginal repair may offer superior results in specific cases, particularly those involving lateral defects. The review also explored the evolution of these techniques, the role of grafts and mesh, and the potential benefits of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The goal is to provide clinicians with comprehensive insights into choosing the appropriate surgical option based on individual patient anatomy and clinical presentation, thus optimizing outcomes and minimizing recurrence.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansQuality of LifeRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaanterior colporrhaphyanterior compartmentparavaginal repairpelvic organ prolapsesurgery

Identifiers

PMID39597050
PMCPMC11596843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.