Outcomes and Complications of Posterior Fossa Surgery in Sitting Versus Park-Bench Positions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Upright positioning in pediatric radiotherapy: rationale, safety considerations and a research roadmap.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
   Article
2. Is the sitting position safe in posterior fossa surgery? An analysis of air embolism risk, complications, and surgical outcomes.Neurosurgical review · 2026
   Observational
3. Quantitative pupillometry as a sensitive tool for detecting tumor-related mass effect in the posterior fossa: a prospective feasibility study comparing metastatic versus skull base lesions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as