ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024
A Multivariate Phenotypical Approach of Sepsis and Septic Shock-A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between sub-phenotypes of coagulopathy and prognosis in sepsis patients in ICU using longitudinal group trajectory modeling: a retrospective analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- The Dual Role of Natural Killer Cells in the Septic Liver.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Bacterial Virulence and Resistance Profiles in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- An individualized nomogram for predicting risk of sepsis in patients with pyogenic liver abscesses: a 10 years retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) for the benefits of sepsis-laboratory evidence for "preventive treatment of disease" and "holistic concept" in the protective effects of acupuncture: a literature review of rodent studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite medical advances, sepsis and septic shock remain some of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with a high inter-individual variability in prognosis, clinical manifestations and response to treatment. Evidence suggests that pulmonary sepsis is one of the most severe forms of sepsis, while liver dysfunction, left ventricular dysfunction, and coagulopathy impact the prognostic. Sepsis-related hypothermia and a hypoinflammatory state are related to a poor outcome. Given the heterogeneity of sepsis and recent technological progress amongst machine learning analysis techniques, a new, personalized approach to sepsis is being intensively studied. Despite the difficulties when tailoring a targeted approach, with the use of artificial intelligence-based pattern recognition, more and more publications are becoming available, highlighting novel factors that may intervene in the high heterogenicity of sepsis. This has led to the devise of a phenotypical approach in sepsis, further dividing patients based on host and trigger-related factors, clinical manifestations and progression towards organ deficiencies, dynamic prognosis algorithms, and patient trajectory in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Host and trigger-related factors refer to patients' comorbidities, body mass index, age, temperature, immune response, type of bacteria and infection site. The progression to organ deficiencies refers to the individual particularities of sepsis-related multi-organ failure. Finally, the patient's trajectory in the ICU points out the need for a better understanding of interindividual responses to various supportive therapies. This review aims to identify the main sources of variability in clustering septic patients in various clinical phenotypes as a useful clinical tool for a precision-based approach in sepsis and septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.