ReviewBiology2024
Can IMTA System Improve the Productivity and Quality Traits of Aquatic Organisms Produced at Different Trophic Levels? The Benefits of IMTA-Not Only for the Ecosystem.
Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards the Establishment of a Sea Urchin Sperm Biobank: Key Challenges and Opportunities for the Conservation and Sustainable Aquaculture ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Physiological Adaptations, Nutritional Strategies, and Health Management in Aquatic Organisms.Biology · 2026Article
- Assessment of water prophylaxis and biosafety in finfish aquaculture - current and emerging technologies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Comparative socioeconomic, environmental and technical analysis of conventional versus smart sustainable integrated multi-trophic aquaponics systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flesh Quality, Shelf Life, and Freshness Assessment of Sea Bream Reared in a Coastal Mediterranean Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IMTA is one of the most innovative and sustainable farming systems, exhibiting the best technique available in rearing aquatic organisms belonging to different positions along the trophic levels. In the literature and in legislation, the environmental benefits of IMTA protocols have been extensively recognized, mainly for its capability to reduce the ecological footprint of intensive aquaculture systems and concretely address the Sustainable Development Goal no. 14 (SDG 14). However, lesser attention is given to the assessments of its role in enhancing the zootechnical performance, animal welfare, and flesh quality of the species involved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review that aims to offer a systematic analysis of the existing literature on the main commercial motivations that could draw the attention of stakeholders, including consumers and fish farmers, towards a greater social acceptability and implementation of the IMTA system on a large scale. The findings suggest that, beyond its environmental advantages, IMTA systems can positively influence the productivity, growth, survival, feed efficiency, and animal health and welfare (AH&W), as well as the nutritional quality of the harvested species, thus offering significant economic and market value both in terms of Environmental, Societal and Governance (ESG) parameters and One Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.