Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39596670›Full record

ReviewGenes2024

Characteristics and Yield of Modern Approaches for the Diagnosis of Genetic Causes of Kidney Stone Disease.

Andrea Spasiano, Mirko Treccani, Elisa De Tomi, Giovanni Malerba, Giovanni Gambaro, Pietro Manuel Ferraro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical and genetic analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea SpasianoSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-7256
Mirko TreccaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-9455
Elisa De TomiSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-374X
Giovanni MalerbaGM Lab, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8705-8560
Giovanni GambaroSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-2370
Pietro Manuel FerraroSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-022X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidney stone disease (KSD) is characterized by an increasing prevalence worldwide, representing an important clinical issue and a financial burden for healthcare systems. A KSD-causing monogenic variant is traditionally expected in up to 30% of children and 1-5% of adults forming stones, confirmed by a strong connection between a positive family history and KSD. The insufficient use of genetic testing in these patients is associated with a lack of perceived benefit and a scarce awareness of inherited kidney diseases. Genetic testing has important practical implications, such as the possibility of earlier diagnoses, familial counseling, and tailored therapy, based on the evaluation of fine-mapped pathogenic variants. Our aim is to analyze the current evidence on genetic testing in KSD patients to whom genetic tests were applied without strict a priori selection criteria, to provide an overview of its diagnostic yield and factors potentially affecting it (such as the age of KSD onset, a familial history of KSD, consanguinity, and extrarenal features).

methodsA literature review was performed, selecting original articles published in the last 10 years concerning genetic investigations in patients affected by nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Available data were subsequently extracted and analyzed.

resultsIn total, 13 studies on 1675 patients (77% pediatric populations) were included; 333 patients were determined to be affected by a monogenic disorder, with an overall yield of about 20%. The likelihood of a positive genetic finding was much higher in pediatric (26%) than adult populations (8%). Cystinuria was the most common diagnosis in both populations. After the removal of conditions that could be identified with a stone composition analysis or urinary chemistry investigation, the diagnostic yield dropped to 19% among pediatric patients and below 5% for adults.

conclusionsGenetic testing should be considered in KSD pediatric patients and in selected subgroups of adults with suggestive features when a diagnosis is not established after stone examination and blood as well as urine metabolic profiling.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingKidney CalculiAdultChildGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansgeneticskidney stone diseasenephrocalcinosisnephrolithiasiswhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39596670
PMCPMC11593538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.