ArticleGenes2024
Genomic Analysis of the Giant Red Shrimp (
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe giant red shrimp,
methodsNext-generation sequencing based on 454 pyrosequencing revealed 58 candidate microsatellite loci for
resultsAs a result, 10 polymorphic loci were identified, which did not present linkage disequilibrium and showed a range of alleles per locus and an observed and expected heterozygosity of 2-10, 0.0667-0.5567, and 0.0661-0.8511, respectively. Nine out of these loci were under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and showed a combined exclusion probability of 0.9202 and 0.9968 in parentage and identity analysis, respectively.
conclusionsThis set of loci will provide a strong set of tools to (i) perform parentage studies and (ii) examine connectivity patterns (horizontal and vertical), including examining the population structure of this species at a variety of geographical scales and, particularly, between exploited populations in shallow waters and deeper unexploited populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.