ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Similarity Analysis of Computer-Generated and Commercial Libraries for Targeted Biocompatible Coded Amino Acid Replacement.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many non-natural amino acids can be incorporated by biological systems into coded functional peptides and proteins. For such incorporations to be effective, they must not only be compatible with the desired function but also evade various biochemical error-checking mechanisms. The underlying molecular mechanisms are complex, and this problem has been approached previously largely by expert perception of isomer compatibility, followed by empirical study. However, the number of amino acids that might be incorporable by the biological coding machinery may be too large to survey efficiently using such an intuitive approach. We introduce here a workflow for searching real and computed non-natural amino acid libraries for biosimilar amino acids which may be incorporable into coded proteins with minimal unintended disturbance of function. This workflow was also applied to molecules which have been previously benchmarked for their compatibility with the biological translation apparatus, as well as commercial catalogs. We report the results of scoring their contents based on fingerprint similarity via Tanimoto coefficients. These similarity scoring methods reveal candidate amino acids which could be substitutable into modern proteins. Our analysis discovers some already-implemented substitutions, but also suggests many novel ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.