ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
High-Throughput Tear Proteomics via In-Capillary Digestion for Biomarker Discovery.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcending genome-wide association studies to create useful multi-omic views of glaucoma.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of tear fluid proteome alterations in dry eye disease: Insights into pathophysiology and biomarker potential.The ocular surface · 2026Review
- Article
- From Proteome to miRNome: A Review of Multi-Omics Ocular Allergy Research Using Human Tears.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Precision in Tear Fluid Biomarker Discovery: Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Small-Volume, Individual Samples Using Capillary Tube Collection.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tear fluid has emerged as a valuable resource for biomarker discovery; however, the limited sample volume, the dynamic composition, and the variability introduced by collection methods all present significant challenges to the analysis and interpretation of the results. A majority of tear proteomic studies have utilized Schirmer strips for tear fluid collection; however, microcapillary collection can provide a superior collection method for proteomic studies when analysis procedures are optimized. We developed a novel, high-throughput in-capillary trypsin digestion workflow that requires as little as 0.5 μL of tear fluid for bottom-up shotgun proteomics. The use of a single microcentrifuge tube for both tear collection and sample processing simplifies sample handling and minimizes both the sample loss and experimental errors associated with sample transfers. This streamlined approach also reduces sample processing time to under 2 h before overnight trypsin digestion, compared to the 5-8 h required by the other methods. Our method uses liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to identify more proteins with greater efficiency than the existing techniques. With this workflow, we identified 500-800 proteins per 0.5 μL sample without peptide fractionation, allowing for at least three technical replicates. The results showed a four-fold increase in the number of proteins identified in the samples. This approach validates the use of microcapillary tear collection, and the innovative processing technique significantly increases the throughput of tear proteomics for biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.