ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Drug Discovery in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Transformative Target-Based Approaches.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive overview of AI methodologies in nano-drug delivery Optimization and Design.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Closing the Translational Gap: Closed-Loop AI Discovery Frameworks for Experimental Validation and Clinical Implementation in Cancer Therapeutics.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Administrative Perspectives on Digital Workflow Transformation and Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Dental Clinics.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Emerging Directions in Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- BPTF-665aa mediate chromatin remodeling drives chemoresistance in T-LBL/ALL.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Role of Nanomedicine in Transforming Pharmacotherapy for Substance Use Disorder (SUD).Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complexities inherent in drug development are multi-faceted and often hamper accuracy, speed and efficiency, thereby limiting success. This review explores how recent developments in machine learning (ML) are significantly impacting target-based drug discovery, particularly in small-molecule approaches. The Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES), which translates a chemical compound's three-dimensional structure into a string of symbols, is now widely used in drug design, mining, and repurposing. Utilizing ML and natural language processing techniques, SMILES has revolutionized lead identification, high-throughput screening and virtual screening. ML models enhance the accuracy of predicting binding affinity and selectivity, reducing the need for extensive experimental screening. Additionally, deep learning, with its strengths in analyzing spatial and sequential data through convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), shows promise for virtual screening, target identification, and de novo drug design. Fragment-based approaches also benefit from ML algorithms and techniques like generative adversarial networks (GANs), which predict fragment properties and binding affinities, aiding in hit selection and design optimization. Structure-based drug design, which relies on high-resolution protein structures, leverages ML models for accurate predictions of binding interactions. While challenges such as interpretability and data quality remain, ML's transformative impact accelerates target-based drug discovery, increasing efficiency and innovation. Its potential to deliver new and improved treatments for various diseases is significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.